🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate around the globe. Politicians, child protection groups, and families are observing closely to see if this strategy will become a template for the rest of the world.

European Momentum

In Europe, a growing chorus of nations are considering comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the leader arguing that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our youngsters' childhood". A law could be enacted soon.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard the young from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have suggested that an Australian-model ban remains "an options in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has asked parliament to enact a proposal increasing the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a related move, including an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The government in The Dutch government has advised parents to restrict their children from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has adopted a advisory resolution supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 unless a parent decides otherwise is provided. Even though it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the step does not establish binding law.

"A strong age limit is a useful foundation," commented a leading parliamentarian supporting the measure.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Stance

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a possible ban, stating that "no measure is off the table" but insisting any decision must be "based on robust research".

Previously, momentum built behind a proposal to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the topic.

Campaign organizations have expressed warnings. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a girl who died after being exposed to dangerous social media material contends that a blanket age ban may not improve online safety and could create a "sudden drop-off" of harm when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the inability of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are appropriate and age appropriate for children," stated a influential online safety campaigner.

The US: A State-by-State Landscape

Stateside, action is mostly occurring at the regional level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has signed a bill barring those below 14 from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has passed a law limiting minors to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra access requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced bills demanding parental consent for minors to open social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from some individuals to follow Australia's path, a federal ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Views

Beyond the West, further countries are similarly taking action.

• The Malaysian government intends to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, world organizations strike a more measured position. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "may even have unintended consequences". The agency notes that the internet can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to invest in user protection.

Even as this international conversation unfolds, the policies of Australia and its followers indicate that policymakers globally are no longer willing to delay for tech companies to act voluntarily.